Posts

Showing posts from March, 2020

US court rules that unlicensed reproduction of NBA players' tattoos in their videogame avatars is not a copyright infringement

Image
Are tattoos protected by copyright? If so, can a person give a third party permission to use their likeness (which includes displaying the tattoos attached to their body) without the consent of the tattoo artist who realized said tattoos? These intriguing questions have been raised in a number of jurisdictions  [see IPKat posts  here ,  here ,  here ,  here ,  here ,  here ,  here ; see also  here  for the (in)famous tattoo copyright headache surrounding  The Hangover - Part II ]  though conclusive answers were not really provided … at least until very recently. Earlier this week, in fact, the US District Court for the Southern District of New York issued its  much-awaited summary judgment opinion (16-CV-724-LTS-SDA)  in the (long-standing) proceedings initiated by a company (Solid Oak), which seemingly holds an exclusive copyright licence in the tattoos of NBA players  Eric Bledsoe ,  LeBron James , and  Kenyon Martin , against videogame developer and publisher Take-Two  [se

Free IP study/revision materials (also) in the time of Coronavirus: a collection

Image
At home and studying IP? The Coronavirus outbreak has been posing major challenges  also  to IP education, with many university classes now moving or already moved online.  Besides the rich IPKat archive, I would like to list in this post some free IP materials I have developed over time and which students/teachers are very welcome to use also at these challenging times. Here we go: Copyright Linking under EU Copyright Law Right of Communication to the Public – Potential Liability Under Article 3(1) InfoSoc Directive Copyright Infringement Checklist UK Copyright Exceptions Copyright in Europe: Main (potential) life events of a work Article 17 Obligations ... In a Chart (Article 17 DSM Directive) Does the DSM Directive mean the same thing in all language versions? The case of 'best efforts' in Article 17(4)(a) Trade Marks EU/National Trade Marks (TMs): Main Life Events (Potential) Trade Mark Infringement Checklist Online intermediaries

The broader teachings of the CJEU 'Fack Ju Göhte' decision: trade marks, freedom of expression, and ... other IP rights

Image
In late February, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its long-awaited  [the  Opinion  of Advocate General (AG) Bobek, on which see  here , had been released in July 2019]  judgment in  Constantin Film , C-240/18 P , aka the  Fack Ju Göhte  case concerning the interpretation of the morality absolute ground in EU trade mark (EUTM) law. The decision is both interesting and important for a number of reasons, including trade mark law, the role of freedom of expression, and also ... copyright.  Let’s see, first, what happened and, then, what the implications of the ruling are. Background Can the sign ‘Fack Ju Göhte’, which is also the name of a  successful German comedy  (followed by two sequels) be registered as an EUTM? Things have not proved easy for this application, initially filed in 2015 for a variety of goods and services in various classes under the  previous Regulation   [this absolute ground has however remained unaltered after the 201