BREAKING: Politico publishes (part of) draft copyright report by MEP Comodini Cachia

MEP Therese
Comodini Cachia
Politico Europe (PRO version) has just published part [so far only the odd pages] of the text of the draft report that MEP Comodini Cachia is preparing on the European Commission's copyright package - including the proposal for a directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market [Katposts here] - at the request of the European Parliament. 

The IPKat has been able to access this part of the text of the draft report, and here are some of the most interesting proposals included therein.

Press publishers' right to disappear and be replaced by a presumption of representation

MEP Comodini Cachia appears willing to suggest that this proposed new sui generis right should be dumped subject to a significant re-thinking. 

In particular, the draft report proposes to re-write Article 11(1) of the proposed directive as follows:

"Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with a presumption of representation of authors of literary works contained therein and the legal capacity to sue in their own name when defending the rights of such authors for the digital use of their press publications."

The future of the
proposed
press publishers' right?
Together with a re-writing of Article 11(1) comes also the deletion of Article 11(4). This paragraph, in the Commission's original proposal, would have made the new press publishers' right subject to a 20-year duration.

Value gap proposal to be clarified

In relation to the so called value gap proposal in Article 13, in her draft report MEP Comodini Cachia notes how the liability regime envisaged therein is complementary to the one already established in the E-commerce Directive, to the extent that Article 13 seeks to ensure the effective implementation of agreements concluded between online service providers and rightholders for the use of works.

In this sense, Article 13 should provide clarity as to which online service providers it refers to, and should use the same classification employed in the E-Commerce.

According to MEP Comodini Cachia, the implementation of agreements between online service providers and rightholders may be carried through technological measures, but these must be respectful of the copyright acquis in its entirety, including relevant exceptions and limitations.

I have only seen part of the newly worded Recital 38, but MEP Comodini Cachia proposes to clarify that the obligation of online service providers to conlcude licensing agreements with rightholders only arises when they are "actively and directly involved in the making available of user uploaded content to the content and where this activity is not of a mere technical, automatic and passive nature".

***


Further details on the draft report will be provided as soon as they become available: stay tuned!
[Originally published on The IPKat on 8 March 2017]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Filmspeler, the right of communication to the public, and unlawful streams: a landmark decision

Image
Yesterday this blog  reported  that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has issued yet another long-awaited judgment, this being the  decision in  Filmspeler , C-527/15 . At the time of writing, the text of the ruling was not yet available. Now that it is and having had a chance to read it, it seems to me that – despite its highly specific factual background (sale of multimedia players enabling free access to audiovisual works protected by copyright without the consent of the rightholders) - Filmspeler is a MAJOR copyright decision. The reason is essentially two-fold: ·         First, because the Court relaxed the notion of what amounts to an ‘indispensable intervention  [the judgment does not even contain a reference to the intervention being ‘indispensable’]  for the sake of the right of communication to the public within Article 3(1) of the  InfoSoc Directive . This means – as I also s...
Read more

Italian court finds Google and YouTube liable for failing to remove unlicensed content (but confirms eligibility for safe harbour protection)

Image
Topazio, one of the soap operas produced by Delta TV Is YouTube an active host and, if so, ineligible for the safe harbour protection within Article 14 of the  E-commerce Directive ? As readers with an interest in intermediary liability know, this is not a novel question: indeed, it has been already raised a number of times before national courts. A few weeks ago, in a  decision available on Marchi & Brevetti  (sentenza 7 April 2017 No 1928, RG 38113/2013,  Delta TV v Google and YouTube  – judge rapporteur: Guglielmo Rende), the Tribunale di Torino (Turin Court of First Instance) revisited this issue, and provided an interesting response. Readers might recall that this decision follows other interim rulings commented on this blog  here  and  here . Background Back in 2013 Delta TV, which produces and owns the copyright to a number of South-American soap operas (including audiovisual works for the Italian, Monaco, Swis...
Read more

Brands and online ecommerce platforms: a tainted relationship?

Image
What has happened to online ecommerce platforms? Over the past few months news reports have multiplied – or, perhaps, their underlying issues have acquired greater visibility – that brand owners have been increasingly voicing criticisms against, sued, or discontinued sales on ecommerce sites. In particular, after the  criticisms  made against Alibaba, it seems that Amazon is now making the headlines. Let’s have a quick look at what has happened over the past few months. Court actions First, there have been legal proceedings being brought by trade mark owners, claiming a direct responsibility of Amazon in the sale of counterfeits or invoking a right to prevent sales on such platform. An example of the former is the  lawsuit  filed by Daimler against Amazon in late 2017 in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle. The well-known  German car manufacturer argues that Amazon is directly responsible for the “ offer fo...
Read more